The Alberta Environmental Farm Plan Company
The Alberta Environmental Farm Plan Company


:. current articles

February 1, 2012:

Feature Article

Rural realtors see value in EFP
January 25, 2012:

Feature Article

New technology, energy plan cuts on-farm energy costs
January 17, 2012:

Feature Article

Three producers, three opinions on EFP value today
January 12, 2012:

Feature Article

Land smarts drive 'Cadillac beef' opportunities
December 19, 2011:

Feature Article

Potato perspective: Snapshots from the big world of stewardship
December 11, 2011:

Feature Article

Making the 'little blue cow' a little greener
December 2, 2011:

Feature Article

On the pulse of stewardship
Archives

  Reprint guide

August 27, 2007
Tech Talk

Do double-walled tanks require a berm around them as well?

If done properly, only one extra level of containment is necessary

Water

Producers are becoming increasingly aware of the contamination risks fuel leaks can present to ground and surface water. A small leak of one drop per second, for example, can release about 900 litres (200 gallons) of gasoline into groundwater over the course of one year. Because of this, many are adding a second level of containment to their existing fuel storage infrastructure.

Double-walled tanks, berms and dikes are all considered acceptable structures for secondary containment. Generally speaking, only one extra level of protection, regardless of the structure being used, is necessary to ensure sufficient containment — if set up properly. For example, a double-walled tank does not require a berm.

There are some fundamentals to consider when installing secondary containment. The decision primarily comes down to sufficient capacity and protection of the structure being used.

Capacity — the 110 percent rule

In order for a double-walled tank, berm or dike to be a fully effective structure for secondary containment, it must include sufficient volume capacity to capture leaking petroleum in the worst possible circumstances.

This is why Alberta Agriculture and Food (AF) and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada / Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration (AAFC / PFRA) technical assistants (TAs) strongly recommend that secondary containments contain 110 percent of the fuel capacity of the existing fuel tank. The containment area must be constructed of an impermeable material such as clay, concrete or a specially designed synthetic liner. This is to both contain the spill and prevent it from migrating into the ground.

By using this simple rule of thumb, the secondary containment structure can capture all of the fuel in the tank, if necessary, with enough room left over to allow for precipitation that hasn't yet been removed or water from fire fighting.

Protection of structures

Secondary containment should be guarded against developing leaks as well. For this reason, the recommended practice is to protect outside walls with barriers in order to prevent equipment from puncturing them.

In an open-air type secondary containment such as a berm or dike, any precipitation that has been collected in the area must be routinely emptied. If the area is left to fill with rainwater, the overall capacity of the containment is reduced. If there is a concern that the rainwater has been contaminated due to small leaks or drips, use a hydrocarbon absorbent before disposing of the water.

Assistance available

Information and assistance on secondary containment, as well as a number of other on-farm environmental practices, is available through a strong network of technical assistants (TAs).


The information on this website is available for reprint with credit to "The Alberta Environmental Farm Plan, www.albertaEFP.com".
Article development courtesy of The Alberta Environmental Farm Plan Company

© 2003– Alberta Environmental Farm Plan
All Rights Reserved.